Medical Progress Today
mpt home | sign up

Volume 3, Number 12
April 7, 2006


PRINTER FRIENDLY

Commentary

Medicare? But that’s for old people

Michael Cannon, Washington Times, 4-1-06

Michael Cannon, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, points out that the Medicare entitlement represents a significant wealth transfer from workers to retirees; from the young to the old—a transfer that changing demographics is making increasingly untenable.

My dad turns 65 today. He will not be pleased that I just gave away his age. He could pass for much younger. This is no April Fool's Day column. Dad really was born on April 1, 1941. Not too long ago, he really was taken to be the son of his not-much-older brother.

Today is going to be tougher than other birthdays, he explained recently. I think it's partly because for most of Dad's life, 65 was a lot older than it is now. Men who reach 65 today live 27 percent longer than they did when Dad was my age. The odds that they won't live to age 75 have dropped a cool 40 percent. Dad probably doesn't much care to be dazzled with mortality statistics just now. But from the standpoint of his wife, children and granddaughters, those trends are excellent news.

There's also that other thing that happens at age 65. It's time to sign up for Medicare, Uncle Sam's health insurance program for old people. Dad was 24 when President Johnson handed former President Truman the nation's first Medicare card. I doubt it occurred to Dad that someday one of those cards would have his name on it. …

Dad and President Truman have something in common: they both showcase the moral complexity of Medicare. Medicare paid Truman's medical bills despite the fact that he never paid Medicare taxes. Dad has paid his Medicare taxes from day one. Yet today's seniors still get more out of the program than they put in. Mom and Dad will probably net over $200,000 on the deal.

The way we pay for Medicare is that young workers pay taxes to support their elders, and later generations return the favor. It looks good on paper, but breaks down in practice. Seniors have more political clout than younger generations, which means that since 1965, every generation of seniors has successfully lobbied for greater Medicare benefits.

Cannon's point is well taken—and stands as yet another reason why Medicare needs a consumer-friendly overhaul to ensure that future generations of truly needy seniors can rely on its benefits.

Source: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6324


Medical Progress Today is published by the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

For more information about Medical Progress Today, please contact the managing editor, Paul Howard, at phoward@manhattan-institute.org, or via telephone at 212.599.7000.

Press inquiries regarding Medical Progress Today can be directed to the Communications Department, at communications@manhattan-institute.org, or via telephone at 212.599.7000.

If you would like to unsubscribe, please reply to us and type "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.

In this week's issue:

commentary

The FDA and MS
Bill of Health
Favorable Medicare Access
The Health of a Nation
Drug Makers First Target of Trial Lawyers
The Vaccine Crisis
Medicare? But that’s for old people

research

Effect of Introduction of the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine on Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
Center for Medical Progress 
Copyright Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
52 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, NY 10017
(212) 599-7000
mpt@manhattan-institute.org