praises a "monumental shift in thinking about Medicare": means testing for Medicare benefits.
Starting Jan. 1, for the first time, the monthly cost of one part of Medicarefor doctor and outpatient billswill be pegged to income. People with incomes of more than $80,000a fraction of all recipientswill pay more than the rest of the Medicare population.
For people who earn more than $80,000, or couples who earn more than $160,000, premiums will jump from $88.50 to about $106. That amount goes up even more for seniors with higher incomes. For the wealthiest seniors, with incomes of more than $200,000, the monthly premium would go to about $162.
Congress approved the surcharge in 2003 while it was digging an even bigger fiscal hole for Medicare by passing a hugely expensive prescription drug benefit.
This is a monumental shift in thinking about Medicare, long overdue. The dollars aren't huge: The charge is expected to raise an extra $20.8 billion over 10 years, said Medicare chief Mark McClellan. That's nowhere near enough to offset the long term Medicarefunding shortfall, caused by spiraling healthcare costs and aging Baby Boomers. But it is a refreshing dose of reality.
Who can argue with this idea? Well, some critics warn that wealthy seniors may abandon that part of Medicare for private insurance rather than pay the higher premiums, leaving the program with sicker and poorer recipients. Sure, Medicare may lose a few wellheeled seniors to private insurance. But most won't budge because they know that Medicare is far and away the best deal going for seniors. You never have to worry that they'll cancel your coverage if you get really sick. Isn't that worth an extra outlay, particularly if you're making upwards of $200,000 a year in retirement?