![]() | |
![]() | home about contact links |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
January 02, 2008The Nanny State Gets MeanThe Nanny State starts out sounding helpful, promising universal care with no waiting. But as costs rise and quality declines, Nanny State bureaucrats have to find ways to slash costs and improve performance. But how to accomplish that in a centralized system that purports to be free at the point of service? Here's a great idea: only offer care to fit, healthy people! You cannot make this stuff up: Britain's National Health Service is floating plans to withold care from the obese and smokers until they shape up. Patients could be required to stop smoking, take exercise or lose weight before they can be treated on the National Health Service, Gordon Brown has suggested. In a New Year message to NHS staff, the Prime Minister indicates people may have to fulfil new "responsibilities" in order to establish their entitlement to care. The new conditions could be set out in a formal NHS "constitution", Mr Brown says. In his open letter to doctors, nurses and other health workers, the Prime Minister promises to press on with Tony Blair's reforms of the NHS, pledging more personalised care for all patients. He adds: "We will also examine how all these changes can be enshrined in a new constitution of the NHS, setting out for the first time the rights and responsibilities associated with an entitlement to NHS care." Creating formal conditions for treatment would build on recent controversial developments in health policy. Despite the NHS commitment to provide free universal care, it is already common for doctors to set conditions on patients seeking treatment. Now the interesting thing about this movement towards "mandatory prevention" is that the government gets to ration care by appealing to popular prejudices about smoking and obesity - that they are merely signs of personal weakness. We are, of course, all in favor of private insurers and employers offering discounts or other perks to employees to help them stay healthy; people who smoke, for instance, pay higher premiums than those who don't. We are even more in favor or individuals having more responsibility for their own health care by owning and controlling their own insurance. But the NHS plan goes beyond market competition or persuasion, which enourages autonomy - it edges toward outright coercion, which is likely to hurt its most vulnerable low-income citizens. The one bright side to this program? The next time Michael Moore heads to the England to praise the NHS, they'll send him off to the gym. Posted by Paul Howard at January 2, 2008 11:30 AM CommentsPost a comment |
|
![]() | ||
| home spotlight commentary research events news about contact links archives | ||