home   about   contact   links
MPT WWW
 
 

September 06, 2007

So Speaketh the New York Times Editorial Board

Well, now, the august editorial board of the New York Times has issued a report card, and we'd better butter Daddy up before we show it to him. Yes, the new Medicare Part D drug benefit has reduced the percentage of older Americans without drug coverage. But many enrollees are "less protected against high drug costs then their counterparts in other plans." The Times' explanation? Part D is insufficiently generous.

It's really quite amazing. In other contexts, the Times opposes increases in the federal budget deficit; so from where would the additional Part D spending come? On that question, the Times offers... silence. A nice tax increase, perhaps? How about allowing the federal behemouth to impose price controls on the drugs it purchases? Does the Times believe that there is a free lunch awaiting us amid the low-hanging fruit? Please, oh Times editorial board: Tell us the answer.

Posted by Benjamin Zycher at September 6, 2007 05:30 AM

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?


PRINT PAGE | EMAIL PAGE
 
IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Free-Market Medicine
by Paul Howard, Ph.D.
August 20, 2008

FORUM

COMMENTARY

RESEARCH

Medical Progress

Intellectual Property
Rights & Innovation

Global Health & Bio-terrorism

Prescriptions for Policy

  
home   spotlight   commentary   research   events   news   about   contact   links   archives
Copyright Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
52 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, NY 10017
(212) 599-7000
mpt@manhattan-institute.org