![]() | |
![]() | home about contact links |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
September 13, 2007Moore Deception from SickoOn today's Wall Street Journal opinion page, John Stossel criticizes filmmaker Michael Moore for putting emotion ahead of sound science in his "mockumentary" film Sicko: In Michael Moore's movie "Sicko," a widow named Julie Pierce tells a tearful story: Her husband died of kidney cancer after their health-insurance company denied payment for a bone-marrow transplant that might have saved his life. Ms. Pierce's rage is palpable as she repeats the word her insurers used in response to her husband's request. "They denied it," she sneers. "Said it was 'experimental.'" Viewers of the documentary are meant to understand that "experimental" is health-insurance code for "expensive," and that Ms. Pierce's husband was left to die for the sake of profit. ... The sad truth is that the treatment isn't effective. When researchers released the results of their clinical trials to the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 1999, they showed that the treatment offered no benefit. Worse, it often killed women faster than their cancer, and caused them unnecessary pain. At a time when their health was at its greatest risk, more than 30,000 women were exposed to an invasive, harmful and ultimately useless treatment that the National Institutes of Health no longer recommends. But only one state legislature has repealed its law requiring insurance companies to pay for the treatment. Some doctors believe bone-marrow transplants might help kidney cancer patients, and the NIH is conducting clinical trials to find out. Until the treatment has been shown to do more good than harm, insurers are reluctant to pay for it. Stossel's point is that government run health care is driven more by fads and headlines than it is by sound science. The reality is that U.S. health care (which is mostly privately financed - at least for now), provides more innovative care for Americans than is available to most patients in other developed countries with government controlled health care. Says Stossel: "People diagnosed with cancer in America have a better chance of living a full life than people in countries with socialized systems. Among women diagnosed with breast cancer, only one-quarter die in the U.S., compared to one-third in France and nearly half in the United Kingdom." Read the whole thing. Posted by Paul Howard at September 13, 2007 01:59 PM CommentsPost a comment |
|
![]() | ||
| home spotlight commentary research events news about contact links archives | ||